Topic wise notes as per new NCHM-JNU syllabus (for B.Sc HHA & M.Sc HA) are are now available at our new website hospitality.institute
Select Page

External factor evaluation matrix

by

External factor evaluation matrix

External Factor Evaluation (EFE) Matrix is a strategy tool used to examine the company’s external environment and to identify the available opportunities and threats.

External Factor Evaluation (EFE) Matrix is a strategic analysis tool used to evaluate a firm’s external environment and to reveal its strengths as well as weaknesses. The external and internal factor analyses have been introduced by Fred R. David in his book, Strategic Management. According to the author, both tools are used to summarise the information gained from the company’s external and internal environment analyses.

External Factor Analysis

Key External Factors

When using the EFE matrix we identify the key external opportunities and threats that are affecting or might affect a company. By analyzing the external environment with tools like PESTLE analysis, Porter’s Five Forces, or Profile Matrix, the key external factors can be identified. The general rule is to identify as many key external and internal factors as possible.

Weights

Each key factor should be assigned a weight ranging from 0.0 (low importance) to 1.0 (high importance). The number indicates how important the factor is if a company wants to succeed in an industry. If there were no weights assigned, all the factors would be equally important, which is an impossible scenario in the real world. The sum of all the weights must equal 1.0. Separate factors should not be given too much emphasis (assigning a weight of 0.30 or more) because the success in an industry is rarely determined by one or a few factors.

Ratings

The ratings in the external matrix refer to how effectively the company’s current strategy responds to the opportunities and threats. The numbers range from 4 to 1, where 4 means a superior response, 3 – above average response, 2 – average response, and 1 – poor response. Ratings, as well as weights, are assigned subjectively to each factor. In our example, we can see that the company’s response to the opportunities is rather poor because only one opportunity has received a rating of 3, while the rest have received a rating of 1. The company is better prepared to meet the threats, especially the first threat.

Weighted Score

The score is the result of weight multiplied by rating. Each key factor must receive a score. The total weighted score is simply the sum of all individual weighted scores. The firm can receive the same total score from 1 to 4 in both matrices. The total score of 2.5 is an average score. In external evaluation, a low total score indicates that the company’s strategies aren’t well designed to meet the opportunities and defend against threats. In internal evaluation, a low score indicates that the company is weak against its competitors.

How useful was this post?

5 star mean very useful & 1 star means not useful at all.

Average rating 5 / 5. Vote count: 1

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.

We are sorry that this post was not useful for you! 😔

Let us improve this post!

Tell us how we can improve this post?

Syllabus BHM308

01 Organizational Strategy

  1. Mission
    1. Mission Statement Elements and its importance
  2. Objectives
    1. The necessity of formal objectives
    2. Objective Vs Goal
  3. Strategy
    1. Developing Strategies
      1. Adaptive Search
      2. Intuition search
      3. Strategic factors
      4. Picking Niches
      5. Entrepreneurial Approach

02 Environmental and Internal Resource Analysis

  1. Need For Environmental Analysis
  2. Key Environmental Variable Factors<
  3. Opportunities and Threats
    1. Internal resource analysis
  4. Functional Areas Resource Development Matrix
  5. Strengths and Weaknesses
    1. Marketing
    2. Finance
    3. Production
    4. Personnel
    5. Organization

03 Strategy Formulation

  1. Strategy (general) Alternatives
    1. Stability Strategies
    2. Expansion Strategies
    3. Retrench Strategies
    4. Combination Strategies
  2. Combination Strategies
    1. Forward integration
    2. Backward integration
    3. Horizontal integration
    4. Market penetration
    5. Market development
    6. Product development
    7. Concentric diversification
    8. Conglomerate diversification
    9. Horizontal diversification
    10. Joint Venture
    11. Retrenchment
    12. Divestiture
    13. Liquidation
    14. Combination

04 Strategic Analysis and Choice (allocation of Resources)

  1. Factors Influencing Choice
    1. Strategy formulation
  2. Input Stage
    1. Internal factor evaluation matrix
    2. External factor evaluation matrix
    3. Competitive profile matrix
  3. Matching Stage
    1. Threats opportunities – weaknesses – strengths matrix (TOWS)
    2. Strategic position and action evaluation matrix (SPACE)
    3. Boston consulting group matrix (BCGM)
    4. Internal – External matrix
    5. Grand Strategy matrix
  4. Decision Stage
    1. Quantitative Strategic Planning Matrix (QSPM)

05 Policies in Functional Areas

  1. Policy
  2. Product Policies
  3. Personnel Policies
  4. Financial Policies
  5. Marketing Policies
  6. Public Relation Policies

06 Strategic Implementation Review and Evaluation

  1. McKinsey 7S Framework
  2. Leadership And Management Style
  3. Strategy Review And Evaluation
    1. Review the underlying bases of Strategy
    2. Measure Organisational Performance
    3. Take corrective actions